1
Send us one real workflow
One recent project or decision that should have moved faster — plus the meeting summary, the board, and one follow-up thread. That's most of what we need.
A five-day diagnostic for growing, AI-enabled teams
Your AI tools are creating more updates than movement.
In 5 business days, we find exactly where decisions, ownership, and priority are getting lost between your meetings, AI summaries, and project tools — and redesign one critical handoff your team can use immediately.
3 founding spots · $3,500 · Applications close August 30, 2026 or when filled.
The problem
You have every tool. So why does execution still feel harder than it should?
Meeting summaries. Project dashboards. Slack threads. Documentation. AI assistants. Automations. You invested in all of it to help the company move faster. But faster output has not consistently produced faster execution.
The meeting ends, but ownership is still open to interpretation. The AI summary looks complete, but the real priority is missing. The project board is updated, but different people are working from different definitions of done.
Nothing looks obviously broken. Yet decisions get revisited, follow-up multiplies, and work requires more coordination than the tools were supposed to eliminate.
? What did we actually decide?
? Who owns this?
? What does "done" look like here?
? Why did this stall?
? Why does the board say one thing and the team say another?
? Why did we buy all these tools if work still requires this much coordination?
The meeting ends, but ownership is fuzzy. The AI summary looks clean, but priority is missing. The board is updated, but no one agrees on what done means. It's not that your people aren't smart — it's that too much still depends on you to reconnect, re-explain, and re-prioritize.
The tools aren't broken. The handoff is.
Decisions, ownership, priority, and context are being captured somewhere — they're just not surviving the trip from conversation, to AI summary, to project tool, to the person who has to act. That's not a tooling gap. It's a design gap. And AI accelerates it, because now there's more output to interpret than ever.
A meeting consultant looks at meetings. A project-management consultant looks at your board. An AI consultant looks at your prompts. We look at the whole chain — and the exact points where meaning stops surviving the trip:
01
What was decided
02
What AI summarized
03
What made it into the plan
04
What got a clear owner
05
What actually moved
Green is clarity. Red is where momentum leaks. The sprint finds your version of this chain — and the specific handoff most worth fixing first.
Left undesigned, this compounds: another tool produces more output, another leader takes longer to reach context, and another project gets reworked because an assumption surfaced too late. The company looks busy, but coordinated movement becomes harder.
The Sprint shows you where activity is failing to become momentum.
How it works
Three steps. Five business days.
2
We map where momentum leaks
A leadership interview, a review of what your tools actually captured, and optional stakeholder interviews.
3
You get one fix, ready to use
Not a 40-page report. One redesigned handoff—a template or standard your team puts to work the morning after the readout.
WHAT YOU GET
The Meeting-to-
Momentum Sprint
In five business days, you'll know whether your tools are helping work move — or just creating the illusion of progress. Here's everything included:
Execution Visibility Gap Summary
A clear explanation of why project updates are not creating visibility leadership can trust—and where the tools may be creating false confidence.
Decision-to-Action Breakdown
A before/after trace of one real workflow, showing exactly where a decision stopped becoming action.
Founder Visibility Gap Summary
A straight answer to why you can't see progress without asking — and where your tools are creating false confidence.
AI Summary Quality Check
Whether your AI-generated summaries actually preserve what execution needs, or just produce clean-looking noise.
Redesigned Execution Handoff
The core deliverable: one practical artifact — a handoff template, definition-of-done standard, or project update format — your team uses immediately.
60-Minute Executive Readout
The three highest-cost leaks, the one fix to make first, and what not to touch yet.
Is this you?
Best Fit — And Who It's Not For
This is for you if...
✓ You lead a 25–200 person tech or tech-enabled company
✓ Your team uses AI meeting summaries and multiple tools
✓ Work moves across systems, and leadership still chases clarity
✓ You feel the company should be moving faster than it is
Not for you if you want...
× A new project management tool or a full Jira/Asana rebuild
× A company-wide operating system implementation
× Generic leadership coaching or a communication workshop
× AI prompt training or tool configuration
Five business days
Find out where momentum is leaking.
You'll leave with three specific leaks, the one highest-leverage fix, and one handoff your team can use the next morning.